 |
You are not currently logged in. Are you accessing the unsecure (http) portal? Click here to switch to the secure portal. |
Difference between revisions of "Trattato della scherma (MS M.383)/Reconstruction"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Michael Chidester moved page Fior di Battaglia (MS M.383)/Reconstruction to Trattato della scherma (MS M.383)/Reconstruction) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The MS M.383 was almost certainly longer when it was first written; its text makes various references to sections on ax, dagger, and grappling which are not present in the book's current state (though they may never have been completed | + | The MS M.383 was almost certainly longer when it was first written; its text makes various references to sections on ax, dagger, and grappling which are not present in the book's current state (though they may never have been completed). Furthermore, there are several points where exactly eight figures are absent compared to the Getty and Pisani Dossi manuscripts. |
| − | The Morgan manuscript is composed of individual cut leaves rather than quires of bifolia, which means that there is no indicator of the original order of the surviving pages. The following speculative reconstruction is based on the manuscript contents and the organization of the other surviving copies; given that no fragment of the | + | The Morgan manuscript is composed of individual cut leaves rather than quires of bifolia, which means that there is no indicator of the original order of the surviving pages. The following speculative reconstruction is based on the manuscript contents and the organization of the other surviving copies; given that no fragment of the dagger section remains on which to base a reconstruction, none will be attempted. Attempting to simulate the collation is also pointless, since determining the quire size is impossible. |
{{{!}} class="dporindex" style="height: 158px; width: 232px;" | {{{!}} class="dporindex" style="height: 158px; width: 232px;" | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
{{!}}} | {{!}}} | ||
{{!}}} | {{!}}} | ||
| − | + | {{-}} | |
{{{!}} class="dporindex" style="height: 158px; width: 232px;" | {{{!}} class="dporindex" style="height: 158px; width: 232px;" | ||
{{!}}+ 7 (250) | {{!}}+ 7 (250) | ||
| Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
{{!}}} | {{!}}} | ||
{{!}}} | {{!}}} | ||
| − | + | {{-}} | |
{{{!}} class="dporindex" style="height: 158px; width: 232px;" | {{{!}} class="dporindex" style="height: 158px; width: 232px;" | ||
{{!}}+ 13 (256) | {{!}}+ 13 (256) | ||
| Line 161: | Line 161: | ||
{{{!}} class="dpor" | {{{!}} class="dpor" | ||
{{!}} [[file:Pisani-Dossi MS 27a.jpg|x150px|center]] | {{!}} [[file:Pisani-Dossi MS 27a.jpg|x150px|center]] | ||
| − | {{!}} [[file:Pisani-Dossi MS 27b. | + | {{!}} [[file:Pisani-Dossi MS 27b modified.png|x150px|center]] |
{{!}}} | {{!}}} | ||
{{!}}} | {{!}}} | ||
| − | + | {{-}} | |
{{{!}} class="dporindex" style="height: 158px; width: 232px;" | {{{!}} class="dporindex" style="height: 158px; width: 232px;" | ||
{{!}}+ 18 (258) | {{!}}+ 18 (258) | ||
| Line 218: | Line 218: | ||
{{!}}} | {{!}}} | ||
{{!}}} | {{!}}} | ||
| − | + | {{-}} | |
{{{!}} class="dporindex" style="height: 158px; width: 232px;" | {{{!}} class="dporindex" style="height: 158px; width: 232px;" | ||
{{!}}+ Missing | {{!}}+ Missing | ||
Latest revision as of 03:00, 12 May 2021
The MS M.383 was almost certainly longer when it was first written; its text makes various references to sections on ax, dagger, and grappling which are not present in the book's current state (though they may never have been completed). Furthermore, there are several points where exactly eight figures are absent compared to the Getty and Pisani Dossi manuscripts.
The Morgan manuscript is composed of individual cut leaves rather than quires of bifolia, which means that there is no indicator of the original order of the surviving pages. The following speculative reconstruction is based on the manuscript contents and the organization of the other surviving copies; given that no fragment of the dagger section remains on which to base a reconstruction, none will be attempted. Attempting to simulate the collation is also pointless, since determining the quire size is impossible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
