 |
You are not currently logged in. Are you accessing the unsecure (http) portal? Click here to switch to the secure portal. |
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Stephen Hand"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Welcome!) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | Hi Stephen. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | Thanks for taking the time to edit the wiki. I just wanted to clarify that interpretive works are considered out of scope for Master and Treatise pages. The '''Additional Resources''' section on those page is limited to scans, transcriptions, translations, and historical context research--in other words, books and articles of the same variety as the content that appears on the page. Books containing primarily interpretation should therefore go on technique pages (when we finally get that section of the wiki off the ground). | |
| − | + | ||
| + | If you have any questions or concerns about this policy, just let me know. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ~ [[user:Michael Chidester|Michael Chidester]] <sup>([[user talk:Michael Chidester|Contact]])</sup> 21:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:35, 23 January 2016
Hi Stephen.
Thanks for taking the time to edit the wiki. I just wanted to clarify that interpretive works are considered out of scope for Master and Treatise pages. The Additional Resources section on those page is limited to scans, transcriptions, translations, and historical context research--in other words, books and articles of the same variety as the content that appears on the page. Books containing primarily interpretation should therefore go on technique pages (when we finally get that section of the wiki off the ground).
If you have any questions or concerns about this policy, just let me know.
~ Michael Chidester (Contact) 21:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
