Talk:J. Ledall

There is probably a scribal mistake in the original: the title of the 14th Point applies to the text of 15th Point, and the title of the 15th Point to the first sequence in the text of the 16th Point, while the title of the 16th Point applies to the second sequence (the 16th Point contains two entire distinct sequences, which occurs nowhere else in the ms.). This is not provable beyond a shadow of a doubt, but it is fairly obvious. Should this be mentioned in the article or is it too interpretive? Jon Pellett 23:38, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Good catch. I can reshuffle the titles in the translation column, and make a note. Michael Chidester 22:25, 2 October 2011 (UTC)