User:Kendra Brown/Florius/English MS Latin 11269 27r

Latin 27r

¶ In cruce prevalidus proprium tibi carpo mucronem.
Hinc te iam mestum cesura cuspide sive
Percutiam. spätaeque manus attollere dicor
Conträrium^[1]. et valeo tua membra ferire patenter.
Tangere nec poteris ullis violatibus ensem.

¶ Te iacio in terram magno/ quem precipis / actu
Nec sum deceptus ensem tibi ponere collo.

Italian

Because my sword has received a blow And because of this catch, my pommel strikes you in the face.	[22a-c] Per la mia spada che a'recevudo colpo E per la presa lo pomo te fier in lo volto
This is another strike with my pommel, Following the quickness of the art and the masters.	[22a-d] Aquesto e un altro ferir de mio pomo Segondo che l'arte e magistri presti sono

English 27r

¶

¶

↑ These umlaut-like dots appear on a few other pages, where they indicate words that should be read as a pair. Here the marked words are both part of a phrase naming a technique, similar to other times the dots appear. Interestingly, on this page it looks like the dots were written by the original scribe (for example, the dots over the a in spataeque have the same faded look as the a). However, appearing on so few pages, these dots don't seem to be part of the overall orthographic style of the manuscript.

[1] These umlaut-like dots appear on a few other pages, where they indicate words that should be read as a pair. Here the marked words are both part of a phrase naming a technique, similar to other times the dots appear. Interestingly, on this page it looks like the dots were written by the original scribe (for example, the dots over the a in spataeque have the same faded look as the a). However, appearing on so few pages, these dots don't seem to be part of the overall orthographic style of the manuscript.

[1]

User:Kendra Brown/Florius/English MS Latin 11269 27r

Latin 27r

Italian

English 27r

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

More

Search

Navigation:

Jump to:

Community:

Tools

donate