Wiktenauer logo.png

Difference between revisions of "Page:MS Latin 11269 02r.jpg"

From Wiktenauer
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Page body (to be transcluded):Page body (to be transcluded):
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>{{hi-res link|http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b8514426f/f7.item}}</noinclude>
 
 
<br/>
 
<br/>
  
:<section begin="2r-b"/>[Nunc/mihi in some order?] [hastile] gero [sed] aprino dente coruscans<br/>Utque ma[nu] que[r]a / penetrabo medullas.<section end="2r-b"/>
+
:<section begin="2r-b"/>Nunc hastile gero {{dec|u|sub}} aprino dente coruscans.<br/>Utque {{dec|u|[??]}} variare quea{{dec|u|m}} / penetrabo medullas.<ref>The second line has been over-written to darken worn-away letters. If there were annotations, they have not survived. </ref><ref>This pair of verses has a bracket at the end, which has been posited as indicating enjambment of the lines by Mondschein. As there is clearly a period at the end of the first line, this cannot be the case here.</ref><section end="2r-b"/>
  
 
<br/>
 
<br/>
  
:<section begin="2r-d"/>{{par|r}} En venio retine[n]s muliebrj pecto[r]e telum.<br/>Nec vereor t[er]ram genib[us] [con]tinge[re] lentis.<br/>Et feriam variata t[ame]n tua lancea p[rae]det.<section end="2r-d"/>
+
:<section begin="2r-d"/>{{par|r}} En venio retine{{dec|u|n}}s muliebrj pecto{{dec|u|r}}e telum.<br/>Nec vereor t{{dec|u|er}}ram genib{{dec|u|us}} {{dec|u|con}}tinge{{dec|u|re}} lentis.<br/>Et feriam variata t{{dec|u|ame}}n tua lancea p{{dec|u|rae}}det.<section end="2r-d"/>

Latest revision as of 21:29, 10 September 2024

This page needs to be proofread.


Nunc hastile gero sub aprino dente coruscans.
Utque [??] variare queam / penetrabo medullas.[1][2]


En venio retinens muliebrj pectore telum.
Nec vereor terram genibus contingere lentis.
Et feriam variata tamen tua lancea praedet.
  1. The second line has been over-written to darken worn-away letters. If there were annotations, they have not survived.
  2. This pair of verses has a bracket at the end, which has been posited as indicating enjambment of the lines by Mondschein. As there is clearly a period at the end of the first line, this cannot be the case here.