You are not currently logged in. Are you accessing the unsecure (http) portal? Click here to switch to the secure portal. |
Difference between revisions of "Vechtboek (MS BPL.3281)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| below = | | below = | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | The '''MS BPL 3281''' is a 16th century [[nationality::Dutch]] [[fencing manual]] written in the 1520s.<ref>According to the [https:// | + | The '''MS BPL 3281''' is a 16th century [[nationality::Dutch]] [[fencing manual]] written in the 1520s.<ref>According to the [https://socrates.leidenuniv.nl/R/-?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=2977867 library catalog entry].</ref> It resides in the holdings of the [[Universiteit Leiden]] in Leiden, Netherlands. The techniques in this manuscript are consistent with those of the [[Nuremberg Group|Nuremberg manuscript complex]] and the art style matches part A of the [[Codex Wallerstein (Cod.I.6.4°.2)|Codex Wallerstein]] (the earliest member of that complex), but its relationship to this tradition remains uncertain. |
== Provenance == | == Provenance == |
Revision as of 16:13, 30 January 2014
Vechtboek | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MS BPL.3281, Universiteit Leiden Leiden, Netherlands | |||||
150px Folio 1r | |||||
| |||||
| |||||
Type | Fencing manual | ||||
Date | 1520s | ||||
Place of origin | Belgium | ||||
Language(s) | Middle Dutch | ||||
Author(s) | Unknown | ||||
Illustrator(s) | Unknown | ||||
Material | Paper, with a modern binding | ||||
Size | 16 folia | ||||
Format | Single-sided; one illustration per page, with text below | ||||
Script | Bastarda | ||||
External data | Library catalog entry | ||||
Treatise scans | Digital scans (2800x3500) |
The MS BPL 3281 is a 16th century Dutch fencing manual written in the 1520s.[1] It resides in the holdings of the Universiteit Leiden in Leiden, Netherlands. The techniques in this manuscript are consistent with those of the Nuremberg manuscript complex and the art style matches part A of the Codex Wallerstein (the earliest member of that complex), but its relationship to this tradition remains uncertain.
Provenance
Contents
Folio | Section |
---|---|
[Three blank leaves] | |
1r - 16r | Anonymous dagger treatise |
[Three blank leaves] |
Gallery
Additional Resources
References
- ↑ According to the library catalog entry.