 |
You are not currently logged in. Are you accessing the unsecure (http) portal? Click here to switch to the secure portal. |
Difference between revisions of "Page:MS V.b.104 106v.png"
David Kite (talk | contribs) (→Not proofread: Created page with "or loue of their Misteris then the victorie shalbe iudged in:<br/> differentlie, as yf two doe wrestle, and they both fall at one<br/> instaunte togethers, neither of them can...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Page status | Page status | ||
| - | + | Proofread | |
| Page body (to be transcluded): | Page body (to be transcluded): | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | or loue of their Misteris then the victorie shalbe iudged | + | or loue of their Misteris then the victorie shalbe iudged indifferentlie, |
| − | + | as yf two doe wrestle, and they both fall at one | |
| − | instaunte togethers, neither of them can be saide to have | + | instaunte togethers, neither of them can be saide to have deserued |
| − | + | victorie or reproche. And such was the opinion of | |
| − | Angelo di Perugia in a question that happened in fight | + | ''Angelo di Perugia'' in a question that happened in fight |
| − | betwext two ffrenchemen at Padoa wherfore seinge | + | betwext two ffrenchemen at ''Padoa'' wherfore seinge |
| − | that the Challenger died not havinge performed his pmise | + | that the Challenger died not havinge performed his pmise |
| − | he ought of right to lose the victorie & his goodes also, yet | + | he ought of right to lose the victorie & his goodes also, yet |
| − | because the defender died & so not sufficient to receave | + | because the defender died & so not sufficient to receave |
| − | victorie, therfore I referre small Iudgemt to the nomber | + | victorie, therfore I referre small Iudgemt to the nomber |
| − | of more expert Soldiers. | + | of more expert Soldiers. ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . |
| − | + | ||
| − | Of two men at Armes, Wherof the one | + | ''Of two men at Armes, Wherof the one Vnhorsed, wth his sworde strake his owne horse, wch horse througe furie of ye wonde goeth to the other horse & fightinge wth him causeth his rider als to fall, in falling breaketh his legge & dieth'' |
| − | + | ||
| − | horse througe furie of ye wonde goeth to the other | + | ''Ca. 14.'' |
| − | horse & fightinge wth him causeth his rider | + | |
| − | als to fall, in falling breaketh his legge & dieth | + | '''It''' hapened that two men at armes beinge at defiaunce |
| − | + | came to combatt wthin a certeine feilde appointed owte by | |
| − | Ca. 14. | + | the furrowe of a plowe where the one gave his ennemie so |
| − | + | great & violente a blowe, as therwthall he was both vnhorsed, | |
| − | It hapened that two men at armes beinge at defiaunce | + | and also striken owt of the lists, who findinge him |
| − | came to combatt wthin a certeine feilde appointed owte by | + | selfe thus overthrowne, not knowinge by what meane he |
| − | the furrowe of a plowe where the one gave his ennemie so | + | might offende his ennemie and save him selfe, wth his |
| − | great & violente a blowe, as therwthall he was both | + | sworde he strake his owne horse, the greif wherof so |
| − | + | moved & provoked him, that all in a rage he fell to bottinge | |
| − | selfe thus overthrowne, not knowinge by what meane he | + | and yarking at the horse of his ennemie, wch he continued |
| − | might offende his ennemie and save him selfe, wth his | + | so longe that he ouerthrewe him, & in fallinge the man |
| − | sworde he strake his owne horse, the greif wherof so | + | brake his legge & also hardelie escaped wth liffe. The |
| − | moved & provoked him, that all in a rage he fell to bottinge | + | question in this case was whether of them had obteined |
| − | and yarking at the horse of his ennemie, wch he continued | + | victorie. And first in the favour of him that had vnhorsed |
| − | so longe that he ouerthrewe him, & in fallinge the man | + | his ennemie & cast him owt of the lists yt may be |
| − | brake his legge & also hardelie escaped wth liffe. The | ||
| − | question in this case was whether of them had obteined | ||
| − | victorie. And first in the favour of him that had | ||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 22:26, 18 May 2021
or loue of their Misteris then the victorie shalbe iudged indifferentlie, as yf two doe wrestle, and they both fall at one instaunte togethers, neither of them can be saide to have deserued victorie or reproche. And such was the opinion of Angelo di Perugia in a question that happened in fight betwext two ffrenchemen at Padoa wherfore seinge that the Challenger died not havinge performed his pmise he ought of right to lose the victorie & his goodes also, yet because the defender died & so not sufficient to receave victorie, therfore I referre small Iudgemt to the nomber of more expert Soldiers. ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ .
Of two men at Armes, Wherof the one Vnhorsed, wth his sworde strake his owne horse, wch horse througe furie of ye wonde goeth to the other horse & fightinge wth him causeth his rider als to fall, in falling breaketh his legge & dieth
Ca. 14.
It hapened that two men at armes beinge at defiaunce came to combatt wthin a certeine feilde appointed owte by the furrowe of a plowe where the one gave his ennemie so great & violente a blowe, as therwthall he was both vnhorsed, and also striken owt of the lists, who findinge him selfe thus overthrowne, not knowinge by what meane he might offende his ennemie and save him selfe, wth his sworde he strake his owne horse, the greif wherof so moved & provoked him, that all in a rage he fell to bottinge and yarking at the horse of his ennemie, wch he continued so longe that he ouerthrewe him, & in fallinge the man brake his legge & also hardelie escaped wth liffe. The question in this case was whether of them had obteined victorie. And first in the favour of him that had vnhorsed his ennemie & cast him owt of the lists yt may be
