Wiktenauer logo.png

Difference between revisions of "Page:MS V.b.104 118r.png"

From Wiktenauer
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Not proofread: Created page with "When a man lefte handed fighteth wth<br/> an other yt striketh wth the righte hande<br/> & they be both hurte on their fightinge<br/> hands. What iudgment ought to be geuen.<b...")
 
 
Page statusPage status
-
Not proofread
+
Proofread
Page body (to be transcluded):Page body (to be transcluded):
Line 1: Line 1:
When a man lefte handed fighteth wth<br/>
+
''When a man lefte handed fighteth wth ''
an other yt striketh wth the righte hande<br/>
+
''an other yt striketh wth the righte hande ''
& they be both hurte on their fightinge<br/>
+
''& they be both hurte on their fightinge ''
hands. What iudgment ought to be geuen.<br/>
+
''hands. What iudgment ought to be geuen. ''
<br/>
+
 
Ca. 27.<br/>
+
''Ca. 27.''
<br/>
+
 
Iff two sholde come to Combatt for lyffe & death, of wch<br/>
+
'''Iff''' two sholde come to Combatt for lyffe & death, of wch  
two the Challinger is left handed, & in fighte cutteth of the<br/>
+
two the Challinger is left handed, & in fighte cutteth of the  
righte hande of his ennemie, who at the same blowe, loseth his<br/>
+
righte hande of his ennemie, who at the same blowe, loseth his  
owne lefte hande. The question is, wch of them hath gained<br/>
+
owne lefte hande. The question is, wch of them hath gained  
moste honnor, or who sholde be reputed victorious or victored, or<br/>
+
moste honnor, or who sholde be reputed victorious or victored, or  
whether the Reproches were equall? ffor whosoeuer indiffer:<br/>
+
whether the Reproches were equall? ffor whosoeuer indifferentlie
entlie considereth the cause shall finde none inequalitie wherup:<br/>
+
considereth the cause shall finde none inequalitie wheruppon
pon anye of them may be reputed as victored, because they were<br/>
+
anye of them may be reputed as victored, because they were  
both berefte of their righte handes. And the Challinger<br/>
+
both berefte of their righte handes. And the Challinger  
maye happelie alleage that the losse was of his lefte hande<br/>
+
maye happelie alleage that the losse was of his lefte hande  
yet the same naturallie seruinge in place of his right hande<br/>
+
yet the same naturallie seruinge in place of his right hande  
he cannot iustlie affirme, but that the losse of his was no lesse<br/>
+
he cannot iustlie affirme, but that the losse of his was no lesse  
vnto him then the wante of the right hande is to the enne:<br/>
+
vnto him then the wante of the right hande is to the ennemie,
mie, and sith the Challenger hath loste the lefte hande wher:<br/>
+
and sith the Challenger hath loste the lefte hande wherwth
wth he sholde perfourme the Combatt, the same also beinge<br/>
+
he sholde perfourme the Combatt, the same also beinge  
more nerer the harte then the right hande, it semeth the<br/>
+
more nerer the harte then the right hande, it semeth the  
greater reproche shold be his. ffor a Challenger ought to ex:<br/>
+
greater reproche shold be his. ffor a Challenger ought to exequute
equute & vanquish, & not to mainteine wth equalitie. It<br/>
+
& vanquish, & not to mainteine wth equalitie. It  
ought further to be considered, that the lefte hande wardeth those<br/>
+
ought further to be considered, that the lefte hande wardeth those  
blowes wch are moste daungerous to the harte, and is as it were<br/>
+
blowes wch are moste daungerous to the harte, and is as it were  
a shielde therunto. So likewise the right hande is fitteth to de:<br/>
+
a shielde therunto. So likewise the right hande is fitteth to defende
fende the heade. offende, & vanquish thennemie.
+
the heade. offende, & vanquish thennemie.

Latest revision as of 22:20, 2 July 2021

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

When a man lefte handed fighteth wth an other yt striketh wth the righte hande & they be both hurte on their fightinge hands. What iudgment ought to be geuen.

Ca. 27.

Iff two sholde come to Combatt for lyffe & death, of wch two the Challinger is left handed, & in fighte cutteth of the righte hande of his ennemie, who at the same blowe, loseth his owne lefte hande. The question is, wch of them hath gained moste honnor, or who sholde be reputed victorious or victored, or whether the Reproches were equall? ffor whosoeuer indifferentlie considereth the cause shall finde none inequalitie wheruppon anye of them may be reputed as victored, because they were both berefte of their righte handes. And the Challinger maye happelie alleage that the losse was of his lefte hande yet the same naturallie seruinge in place of his right hande he cannot iustlie affirme, but that the losse of his was no lesse vnto him then the wante of the right hande is to the ennemie, and sith the Challenger hath loste the lefte hande wherwth he sholde perfourme the Combatt, the same also beinge more nerer the harte then the right hande, it semeth the greater reproche shold be his. ffor a Challenger ought to exequute & vanquish, & not to mainteine wth equalitie. It ought further to be considered, that the lefte hande wardeth those blowes wch are moste daungerous to the harte, and is as it were a shielde therunto. So likewise the right hande is fitteth to defende the heade. offende, & vanquish thennemie.