You are not currently logged in. Are you accessing the unsecure (http) portal? Click here to switch to the secure portal. |
Do you have permission to re-use this image? Just because scans appear on Wiktenauer does not mean that they are free to use. Wiktenauer is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, and many of the scans we host are only licensed for nonprofit use. In other cases, the scans have no standard license and Wiktenauer has received special permission to host them (and can't grant that permission to anyone else). The license terms appear in the Copyright and License Terms box at the bottom of the page that sent you here. When in doubt, always check with the museum or library that owns a manuscript before publishing or otherwise reusing its scans. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nicolaüs"
m (Michael Chidester moved page Talk:Nicolaüs Augsburger to Talk:Nicolaüs) |
Eric Burkart (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TOC right}} | {{TOC right}} | ||
{{#lst:{{BASEPAGENAME}}|sourcebox}} | {{#lst:{{BASEPAGENAME}}|sourcebox}} | ||
+ | The mention of a certain "Nicolaus thum" on fol. 189r of Glasgow, Glasgow Museums, R. L. Scott Collection, E.1939.65.354 is definitely NOT the name of a fencing master. It is a colophon mentioning the scribe and the date of accomplishment of the text that has been copied into the fight book of Gregor Erhart alongside with the text. This name has nothing to do with the authorship of the Liechtenauer gloss that was copied. There is furthermore no indication that directly associates "Nicolaus thum" with Augsburg. I would therefore propose to change the title for "Gloss C" because the invention of a fencing master "Nicolaus" is misleading. Besides, the overlap of the copy in E.1939.65.354 with the most important specimen of this gloss is very thin. [23/11/09, Eric Burkart] |
Latest revision as of 11:31, 9 November 2023
The mention of a certain "Nicolaus thum" on fol. 189r of Glasgow, Glasgow Museums, R. L. Scott Collection, E.1939.65.354 is definitely NOT the name of a fencing master. It is a colophon mentioning the scribe and the date of accomplishment of the text that has been copied into the fight book of Gregor Erhart alongside with the text. This name has nothing to do with the authorship of the Liechtenauer gloss that was copied. There is furthermore no indication that directly associates "Nicolaus thum" with Augsburg. I would therefore propose to change the title for "Gloss C" because the invention of a fencing master "Nicolaus" is misleading. Besides, the overlap of the copy in E.1939.65.354 with the most important specimen of this gloss is very thin. [23/11/09, Eric Burkart]