Wiktenauer logo.png

Difference between revisions of "Salvator Fabris"

From Wiktenauer
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 299: Line 299:
 
| <p>[9] '''Engaging the sword'''. How it is done and when completed.</p>
 
| <p>[9] '''Engaging the sword'''. How it is done and when completed.</p>
  
<p>To engage the sword is to gain an advantage over it; it is a kind of counter-position with some difference, because often you have engaged, the adversary's sword without completely closing the line from his, point to your body. But it has this advantage, that your adversary cannot hit without passing your ''forte'', which is so near his point, that you can find the point while he is moving to make the lunge. The counter-position is not considered well formed except when the line from his point to your body is fully defended. But the same advantage may be obtained by relative strength, so that you are considered to have engaged, when you are sure that your sword is stronger than the adversary's and cannot be pushed aside, but can push his aside. When on guard and wishing to engage the adversary's sword, you must carry your point towards his, with the fourth part of the blade against his fourth, but rather more of your fourth part than of his, for that little more, though little, will be enough to give you the advantage, when you have engaged his sword at the weaker part. You must bear in mind that the sword is always stronger in the line in which the point is directed, and in order to advance in that line ---------- you must know how to carry your body and sword in such a way that their strength is in the same direc-<ref>There's no conclusion of this word on the next page, just a new sentence.</ref> This depends to a great extent on the wrist, as will be seen in the plate illustrating the guard on the inside, which is the most difficult. You must also take care, in trying to engage the fourth part, to keep your point at such a distance from the adversary's sword, that he will not have time to push forward the third or even the second part, with the result that while meaning to engage his ''faible'' you would have engaged his ''forte''. This might happen owing to the distance between the two swords, for the amount you can push your sword forward before engaging is the same as the distance. You must move at the same time as he moves, otherwise you might be hit. Moreover, although the space between the two points were small, while you were advancing to engage, the adversary might perceive this and make an angle, which would strengthen him and bring him away from your advance. If you should push on in order to hit when within distance, his ''forte'' would have penetrated so far, that if you had moved in order to engage his sword, you would be unable to defend yourself, and would be hit. Further, if while you are trying to engage, he moved his body away from your point, he could pass right on to your body, before your sword had returned into line. To prevent your adversary's doing this you must first consider the distance between your bodies, and then move forward to engage his sword, carrying your sword without constraint so as to be free to abandon your first plan, when your adversary seizes the opportunity, and drives the point on to his body, bringing the ''forte'' where you intended to put the point. In this way you will hit the adversary at the moment when he is pushing forward. You must remember that this rule applies to the guard on the inside, for, if on the outside, you must abandon your first movement and drop the point under the adversary's sword to the right side, carrying the ''forte'' where you meant to put the point. On this line too the present method is very successful if you similarly do not touch the sword in seeking to engage. The nearer the adversary is, the better and safer the method is. The advantage is in having brought your ''forte'' against his ''faible''.</p>
+
<p>To engage the sword is to gain an advantage over it; it is a kind of counter-position with some difference, because often you have engaged, the adversary's sword without completely closing the line from his, point to your body. But it has this advantage, that your adversary cannot hit without passing your ''forte'', which is so near his point, that you can find the point while he is moving to make the lunge. The counter-position is not considered well formed except when the line from his point to your body is fully defended. But the same advantage may be obtained by relative strength, so that you are considered to have engaged, when you are sure that your sword is stronger than the adversary's and cannot be pushed aside, but can push his aside. When on guard and wishing to engage the adversary's sword, you must carry your point towards his, with the fourth part of the blade against his fourth, but rather more of your fourth part than of his, for that little more, though little, will be enough to give you the advantage, when you have engaged his sword at the weaker part. You must bear in mind that the sword is always stronger in the line in which the point is directed, and in order to advance in that line ---------- you must know how to carry your body and sword in such a way that their strength is in the same direc-<ref name="hyphen">There's no conclusion of this word on the next page, just a new sentence.</ref> This depends to a great extent on the wrist, as will be seen in the plate illustrating the guard on the inside, which is the most difficult. You must also take care, in trying to engage the fourth part, to keep your point at such a distance from the adversary's sword, that he will not have time to push forward the third or even the second part, with the result that while meaning to engage his ''faible'' you would have engaged his ''forte''. This might happen owing to the distance between the two swords, for the amount you can push your sword forward before engaging is the same as the distance. You must move at the same time as he moves, otherwise you might be hit. Moreover, although the space between the two points were small, while you were advancing to engage, the adversary might perceive this and make an angle, which would strengthen him and bring him away from your advance. If you should push on in order to hit when within distance, his ''forte'' would have penetrated so far, that if you had moved in order to engage his sword, you would be unable to defend yourself, and would be hit. Further, if while you are trying to engage, he moved his body away from your point, he could pass right on to your body, before your sword had returned into line. To prevent your adversary's doing this you must first consider the distance between your bodies, and then move forward to engage his sword, carrying your sword without constraint so as to be free to abandon your first plan, when your adversary seizes the opportunity, and drives the point on to his body, bringing the ''forte'' where you intended to put the point. In this way you will hit the adversary at the moment when he is pushing forward. You must remember that this rule applies to the guard on the inside, for, if on the outside, you must abandon your first movement and drop the point under the adversary's sword to the right side, carrying the ''forte'' where you meant to put the point. On this line too the present method is very successful if you similarly do not touch the sword in seeking to engage. The nearer the adversary is, the better and safer the method is. The advantage is in having brought your ''forte'' against his ''faible''.</p>
  
 
<p>It often happens that the adversary, finding his sword is not molested is not aware that you have already gained the advantage, whereas if you touch his sword he more easily realises the fact, and can disengage or retreat or change his guard, in order to free himself, so that you lose your first advantage. Moreover if you touch the sword, you impede and disconcert yourself, so that if a ''time'' comes to hit, you cannot take it because of the resistance of your adversary's sword. Even when there is no resistance and the adversary disengages, you cannot prevent your point dropping a little, so that the ''time'' is lost. But if you keep your sword suspended, it is the more ready for every opportunity, there is more use made of ''time'', and there is no necessity to force his sword, which often leads to scuffling. If you do not touch swords, that cannot happen. When then you advance to engage your adversary's sword and he moves to meet you at the same time, the one who first yields with the sword and drives on to the body, can hit before the other touches swords, or in the same instant. If you do not wish to try a hit, you can lower your point towards the ground to prevent the adversary's engaging, and if he follows it you can thrust while his sword is falling. There are many other ways of preventing your adversary from engaging your sword, except when the point hits, especially if you have won the advantage of the ''forte'' against the ''faible'' and the swords are in position. In endeavouring to acquire the advantage over the adversary's sword you must take care not to advance the point so far in your desire to be the stronger, that he can pass in one line or another, before you can direct your point. If you observe these rules you will without doubt gain the control of your adversary's sword, which is the first part of victory. Though your adversary takes advantage of the ''time'' he will still be hit. To prevent your getting this advantage he will have to retreat, changing the position of his body and sword and to adopt new devices, which are countless. The one who is more subtle in his movements will maintain his sword the freer.</p>
 
<p>It often happens that the adversary, finding his sword is not molested is not aware that you have already gained the advantage, whereas if you touch his sword he more easily realises the fact, and can disengage or retreat or change his guard, in order to free himself, so that you lose your first advantage. Moreover if you touch the sword, you impede and disconcert yourself, so that if a ''time'' comes to hit, you cannot take it because of the resistance of your adversary's sword. Even when there is no resistance and the adversary disengages, you cannot prevent your point dropping a little, so that the ''time'' is lost. But if you keep your sword suspended, it is the more ready for every opportunity, there is more use made of ''time'', and there is no necessity to force his sword, which often leads to scuffling. If you do not touch swords, that cannot happen. When then you advance to engage your adversary's sword and he moves to meet you at the same time, the one who first yields with the sword and drives on to the body, can hit before the other touches swords, or in the same instant. If you do not wish to try a hit, you can lower your point towards the ground to prevent the adversary's engaging, and if he follows it you can thrust while his sword is falling. There are many other ways of preventing your adversary from engaging your sword, except when the point hits, especially if you have won the advantage of the ''forte'' against the ''faible'' and the swords are in position. In endeavouring to acquire the advantage over the adversary's sword you must take care not to advance the point so far in your desire to be the stronger, that he can pass in one line or another, before you can direct your point. If you observe these rules you will without doubt gain the control of your adversary's sword, which is the first part of victory. Though your adversary takes advantage of the ''time'' he will still be hit. To prevent your getting this advantage he will have to retreat, changing the position of his body and sword and to adopt new devices, which are countless. The one who is more subtle in his movements will maintain his sword the freer.</p>
Line 398: Line 398:
 
<p>There are various ways of holding the sword and the arm, as will be seen in the following plates, which will illustrate the variety of the guards. Since one method is better than another we shall treat of the principal ones, reserving a fuller discussion until we treat of the nature of the guards. They will be illustrated separately on the plates. Some hold the sword at an angle and the arm a little advanced towards the knee with the hand in ''tierce'', or slightly outwards towards the guard in ''seconde''. Others hold the arm withdrawn and the sword in such a manner as to make a straight line from the elbow to the point. Others extend the arm as far as possible and hold the sword straight, making a straight line from the shoulder to the point of the sword. This method is very cautious, because it keeps the adversary at a distance, but is very fatiguing, and the sword is weaker than with the other guards because of the distance of the hand from the body. In this position your sword is more easily engaged by the adversary and great pains are needed to keep it free. When you can do this, the position is a great impediment to your adversary, because he cannot approach so as to hit, seeing the point so near, and cannot advance owing to the same danger, unless he can engage the point and drive it out of presence. Even though he places the ''forte'' of his sword against your ''faible'' and tries to hit, it would hardly succeed, since there is little uncovered and he cannot hit unless his ''faible'' passes your ''forte'', which you could easily prevent, if he tries to hit below, he will easily be hit above, for your sword being nearer and already extended must arrive first. Therefore in order to hit more safely he must remove your sword, and seizing the chance carry his body out of line on the one side or the other and pass on to the body. For he cannot hit until he has passed the point nor save himself or his recovery; therefore it is better for him to follow on. This method is the more likely to succeed, as it is difficult for one who holds his sword thus extended and high to maintain his point in line since with but a small movement his adversary could pass out of line. He could easily pass underneath by lowering his body. It is however true that one who forms this guard properly holds his sword extended and keeps his feet close together, so that the lower parts are kept withdrawn, as they are more exposed and difficult to protect. Also he can then advance further in hitting and similarly retreat, if his adversary approaches too near. For with this guard the adversary must be kept at a distance, otherwise he would find it easy to pass. For the same reasons the guard is a good defense against cuts, since the ''forte'' of the sword is already pushed forward, to that the adversary's sword cannot fall without meeting it. If ht tries to hit below, he cannot reach before one, who holds his sword extended, has arrived with the fourth part of his blade. If he keeps his feet close together, he can reach all the further, although the extended arm is in greater danger. Still it is easy to defend by a slight motion towards the part threatened by the sword, lowering the point more or less, as the cut is high or low, and keeping the point in line. Certainly you should often practise this guard in order to learn how to hit without hurling the arm forward. You must hit, but you must keep the arm steady, and let the motion of the foot and the body suffice. This guard will teach you to hold your sword close to the adversary, where you can more easily hit him, and similarly to keep it free. Some hesitate to advance the sword, lest it should be engaged and subjected by the adversary.</p>
 
<p>There are various ways of holding the sword and the arm, as will be seen in the following plates, which will illustrate the variety of the guards. Since one method is better than another we shall treat of the principal ones, reserving a fuller discussion until we treat of the nature of the guards. They will be illustrated separately on the plates. Some hold the sword at an angle and the arm a little advanced towards the knee with the hand in ''tierce'', or slightly outwards towards the guard in ''seconde''. Others hold the arm withdrawn and the sword in such a manner as to make a straight line from the elbow to the point. Others extend the arm as far as possible and hold the sword straight, making a straight line from the shoulder to the point of the sword. This method is very cautious, because it keeps the adversary at a distance, but is very fatiguing, and the sword is weaker than with the other guards because of the distance of the hand from the body. In this position your sword is more easily engaged by the adversary and great pains are needed to keep it free. When you can do this, the position is a great impediment to your adversary, because he cannot approach so as to hit, seeing the point so near, and cannot advance owing to the same danger, unless he can engage the point and drive it out of presence. Even though he places the ''forte'' of his sword against your ''faible'' and tries to hit, it would hardly succeed, since there is little uncovered and he cannot hit unless his ''faible'' passes your ''forte'', which you could easily prevent, if he tries to hit below, he will easily be hit above, for your sword being nearer and already extended must arrive first. Therefore in order to hit more safely he must remove your sword, and seizing the chance carry his body out of line on the one side or the other and pass on to the body. For he cannot hit until he has passed the point nor save himself or his recovery; therefore it is better for him to follow on. This method is the more likely to succeed, as it is difficult for one who holds his sword thus extended and high to maintain his point in line since with but a small movement his adversary could pass out of line. He could easily pass underneath by lowering his body. It is however true that one who forms this guard properly holds his sword extended and keeps his feet close together, so that the lower parts are kept withdrawn, as they are more exposed and difficult to protect. Also he can then advance further in hitting and similarly retreat, if his adversary approaches too near. For with this guard the adversary must be kept at a distance, otherwise he would find it easy to pass. For the same reasons the guard is a good defense against cuts, since the ''forte'' of the sword is already pushed forward, to that the adversary's sword cannot fall without meeting it. If ht tries to hit below, he cannot reach before one, who holds his sword extended, has arrived with the fourth part of his blade. If he keeps his feet close together, he can reach all the further, although the extended arm is in greater danger. Still it is easy to defend by a slight motion towards the part threatened by the sword, lowering the point more or less, as the cut is high or low, and keeping the point in line. Certainly you should often practise this guard in order to learn how to hit without hurling the arm forward. You must hit, but you must keep the arm steady, and let the motion of the foot and the body suffice. This guard will teach you to hold your sword close to the adversary, where you can more easily hit him, and similarly to keep it free. Some hesitate to advance the sword, lest it should be engaged and subjected by the adversary.</p>
  
<p>You will learn also to hold the arm correctly, and after such practice, when the opportunity comes, you will act more promptly and correctly. One who is unpractised often makes a mistake of too much or too little, and is not sure in his defence; moreover he does not extend so far as if he had practised. Those who hold the sword at an angle in ''tierce'' with the hand before the knee, or in ''seconde'' with the arm outside, have a stronger hold of the sword, but the body is too much expos-<ref>There's no conclusion of this word on the next page, just a new sentence.</ref> Your adversary can approach further, and with this ''tierce'' you cannot disengage, as with your sword at such an angle it would take too long. In the ''seconde'' although the sword is at angle you can easily disengage; but both of them are bad in defence against an opponent who can thrust in the straight line, because such thrusts come to the body without approaching the ''forte'' of the sword held at an angle, so that in the effort to parry you would have to make a large movement and often would be too late. Even if you are in time the movement is so slow, that your adversary may easily change either into another straight line, or into an angle, as opportunity offers. For a thrust at an angle is most likely to pass, but thrusts in the straight line cannot pass one another; if of equal force they will nullify each other. If you hit it will be because your thrust was stronger by having engaged his ''faible'' better. The weaker will always be driven out of the line, and the other will pass on and hit. But the thrust at an angle passes on and hits without a junction of the blades; such thrusts rather yield to one another, and therefore are very likely to pass and hit the part aimed at. Further one who fences with his sword at an angle can change only by a large movement. It is impossible that his point and hand should not make a large circle in the direction in which he has moved, all the larger if he changes from one angle to another, and incomparably larger if he disengages. The movement, however, would be smaller, if the change is from an angle to a straight line, but would still be so large that, if within distance, he would be hit. To hold the sword at an angle is well enough for thrusting, but not for the defence. To proceed against such a guard with security it is necessary to be able to use the advantage not only of the sword, but of the body and the foot, and to realise well the strength of the angle, otherwise while hitting you will also be hit.</p>
+
<p>You will learn also to hold the arm correctly, and after such practice, when the opportunity comes, you will act more promptly and correctly. One who is unpractised often makes a mistake of too much or too little, and is not sure in his defence; moreover he does not extend so far as if he had practised. Those who hold the sword at an angle in ''tierce'' with the hand before the knee, or in ''seconde'' with the arm outside, have a stronger hold of the sword, but the body is too much expos-<ref name="hyphen"/> Your adversary can approach further, and with this ''tierce'' you cannot disengage, as with your sword at such an angle it would take too long. In the ''seconde'' although the sword is at angle you can easily disengage; but both of them are bad in defence against an opponent who can thrust in the straight line, because such thrusts come to the body without approaching the ''forte'' of the sword held at an angle, so that in the effort to parry you would have to make a large movement and often would be too late. Even if you are in time the movement is so slow, that your adversary may easily change either into another straight line, or into an angle, as opportunity offers. For a thrust at an angle is most likely to pass, but thrusts in the straight line cannot pass one another; if of equal force they will nullify each other. If you hit it will be because your thrust was stronger by having engaged his ''faible'' better. The weaker will always be driven out of the line, and the other will pass on and hit. But the thrust at an angle passes on and hits without a junction of the blades; such thrusts rather yield to one another, and therefore are very likely to pass and hit the part aimed at. Further one who fences with his sword at an angle can change only by a large movement. It is impossible that his point and hand should not make a large circle in the direction in which he has moved, all the larger if he changes from one angle to another, and incomparably larger if he disengages. The movement, however, would be smaller, if the change is from an angle to a straight line, but would still be so large that, if within distance, he would be hit. To hold the sword at an angle is well enough for thrusting, but not for the defence. To proceed against such a guard with security it is necessary to be able to use the advantage not only of the sword, but of the body and the foot, and to realise well the strength of the angle, otherwise while hitting you will also be hit.</p>
  
 
<p>To hold the arm withdrawn and the sword straight, forming a straight line from the elbow to the point, is a better rule. In this manner you can better acquire the superiority, hit and parry, and on occasion disengage more swiftly, since your body is more defended by the ''forte'' and the point is more easily maintained in line. Still you should know how to use any method at need, for you cannot understand the nature of what you have not practised, nor to what it may lead. You must remember that one rule will not serve for all cases, but each has its appropriate end, and what is good in one case will not serve in another. Therefore, as we have already said, you must be rich in devices and understand the time when they may be used.</p>
 
<p>To hold the arm withdrawn and the sword straight, forming a straight line from the elbow to the point, is a better rule. In this manner you can better acquire the superiority, hit and parry, and on occasion disengage more swiftly, since your body is more defended by the ''forte'' and the point is more easily maintained in line. Still you should know how to use any method at need, for you cannot understand the nature of what you have not practised, nor to what it may lead. You must remember that one rule will not serve for all cases, but each has its appropriate end, and what is good in one case will not serve in another. Therefore, as we have already said, you must be rich in devices and understand the time when they may be used.</p>
Line 689: Line 689:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 14.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 14.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 012.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 012.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[30] </p>
 +
 
 +
<p>This plate illustrates an extension in ''tierce'', which shows how to advance the foot, bend the knee and incline the body sideways, so that there is little exposed. It also teaches how to stretch the wrist in order to lengthen the line and reach further in a lunge, and to recover after making the thrust. If you wish to recover quickly, you must not straighten the body, but bend the knee of the leg to the rear, bringing the weight of the body on to it low down, so that the forward leg is straightened and relieved of the weight in such a way, that you can easily and conveniently raise it. You perceive that all these things must be done in one ''time'', and that if you do not know how to shift the weight of the body you cannot readily raise the foot, especially when the feet are far apart and the body much bent, except with great inconvenience, difficulty and length of time.</p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/></p>
Line 705: Line 707:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 04.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 04.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 013.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 013.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[31] <br/><br/><br/></p>
 +
 
 +
<p>This is a guard in ''quarte'', the last of the four guards. It is formed simply with the arm at an angle, for which reason you are strengthened, and sufficiently covered on the inside. But you cannot disengage with much promptness, and on the outside are much exposed because of the angle formed by the arm and the hand. Although your position is strong, still if the adversary attempts to hit, it would not be so good to parry or to attempt to hit under the sword on the right side of the guard, letting his point pass without parrying. In this manner you would be most successful; for your arm being at such am[!] angle, if your adversary wishes to reach the body, his point must pass inside that arm. If the arm is extended towards the inside, it will cover all the part, which was seen exposed before, and will hit without touching the adversary's sword. With this guard, if you have an opportunity to change from ''quarte'' to ''seconde'', the result will be effective, and still more so if the arm is fully extended from its present angle. The hand will be so far on the inside, that the adversary's sword cannot cover much in that line. When you change to ''seconde'', an angle opposite to the first will be formed, so that your adversary cannot be in as strong a position. It will be all the better if in changing you continue on to the body. For if you measure the path taken by your point in hitting and the path taken by the adversary's point in defending, you will find that the path of the defending point is the greater. Although your hand has moved from one angle to another, a large movement, still the point will have gone to the body without shifting. Thus that large movement will have done damage to the adversary and not to yourself, if you have changed the front of your body by moving it out of the line of his point.</p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/><br/></p>
Line 722: Line 726:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 08.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 08.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 014.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 014.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[32] <br/><br/></p>
 +
 
 +
<p>The plate represents an extended guard in ''quarte''. It is much better than the preceeding[!] one, and beyond comparison more cautious than all the others, because it keeps the adversary at a distance. He cannot be sure of engaging your sword, because with this guard you can disengage easily and subtly and with greater promptness than with the other on one side or the other. Its greatest strength is on the outside, where you cannot be hit, and the inside is assured by the effect of the hand being turned in that direction in such a way, that no path is left for the adversary to take, except by pushing your sword out of the line, a dangerous plan, as with this guard the disengage and double disengage are swift. His only resource is to try to disorder your sword by a feint or a movement, in order to hit below, carrying his body suddenly forward; for he could not reach with a lunge without putting himself in greater danger of an attack. Thus this is the most secure of the four extended guards, as we have said. There is no other which can be maintained with greater ease, with the sword more ready and free.</p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 738: Line 744:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 10.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 10.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 015.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 015.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[33] <br/><br/></p>
 +
 
 +
<p>This is also a guard in ''quarte'' and very different from the two last. As you may see in the plate, the chest is exposed to the adversary and the feet in an oblique line. The intention is to move to either side according to the opportunity. The adversary cannot proceed to hit either your chest or head, for your feet are on either side of his sword, so that by lifting one of them your body will be out of line, so that you can hit in ''quarte'', in ''tierce'' or in ''seconde'', as the ''time'' and the occasion demand. With this guard you are uncovered on the outside. You invite your adversary to attempt a hit there, knowing that it is the strongest part, and that the angle is naturally of such a kind, that if he tries to hit in that place, by carrying the left foot in a straight line, extending the arm and leaving the hand in the same position, you will hit your adversary below on the right, or above by making the angle still larger and carrying the hand as high as the shoulder. In this way your lunge will be so strong that, however much your adversary tries to parry, he will still be hit. If he approaches too close without resolution, you should turn your hand from ''quarte'' to ''seconde'', covering the head and carrying the left foot forward, and pass on with body and sword you will make a hit in the chest in seconde. With this guard you must take care to be so far advanced that as you change to ''seconde'' the head may penetrate the adversary's point with the bending of the body, and you may then proceed to hit and carry your left hand to his hilt, if adversary disengaged in order to hit in the lower lines, he would effect nothing, because your sword, which would have already begun to change into that line, would prevent him, and would hit on the outside, for you would have brought both sides of your body equally forward; this excellent result would be due to the length of your reach and the strength of your sword. In this way the only difference would be that your body would pass on the outside instead of the inside. With this guard you may easily use the left hand.</p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 760: Line 768:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 11.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 11.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 016.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 016.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[34] <br/><br/><br/></p>
 +
 
 +
<p>Although this guard resembles the last, nevertheless it has considerable differences, for in this guard the sword is held in such a manner, that the hand does not form an angle on the outside, but the wrist is inclined inwards, and bends the sword so that it appears foreshortened. Whereas the other ''quartes'' are stronger on the outside, this ''quarte'' has more power on the inside owing to this foreshortening of the sword, and also to the position of the body with the left side so far forward, as is seen. We have included this guard in order to show how you may advance on the inside to subject the adversary's sword, which is in ''seconde'' at an angle. You must know that the greater the angle your sword forms, the greater is your force in that line. If the adversary tried to hit your exposed part, he might himself be hit through the angle of the guard in ''seconde'', if he did not hit with the advantage of the line for the straight line always reaches farther, or did not avoid with his body, or wait until his opponent came within distance in order to be able to hit and withdraw. But for passing at the fitting opportunity without being hit there is no sounder or better position than the one seen here. For, whatever the angle of the adversary's sword, this foreshortened sword will push his way and will be stronger than the ''seconde'', so that he will be forced to change his guard, or retreat; otherwise you will at the slightest move-<ref name="hyphen"/> proceed to hit and pass to the body.</p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/><br/></p>
Line 776: Line 786:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 15.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 15.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 017.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 017.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[35] <br/><br/></p>
 +
 
 +
</p>Here we have placed an extention[!] in ''quarte'' to be used in lunging in order that you may understand the working of the foot, body and hand together. With this extension you hit with the head covered and without turning it, as some do. It would be better to turn and raise the hand a little, and if you had first extended in ''quarte'', the hand would have moved little; nevertheless however great or small its movement, it would certainly be better than turning the head and losing light of your adversary's movements. Holding the head back with the idea of its being safer, is an obvious error, since the further your head is from your ''forte'', the greater the danger it runs. Moreover, if you hold the head back, you cannot lunge far enough to reach the adversary's body. Also you must keep your eyes on your adversary's sword hand, not only when steady, but in passing and turning the body, on whichever foot. As to recovering with the body bent so far forward and the feet so far apart you must observe the rule described when we spoke of the lunge in ''tierce''.</p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 792: Line 804:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 17.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 17.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 018.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 018.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[36] <br/><br/></p>
 +
 
 +
<p>Here follows another extension in ''quarte'', in which the right foot has been turned. The lunge is made by advancing the right foot only, turning it in the air in such a manner that the turn is complete as it reaches the ground, as you may see. The plate shows that the turning of the foot most[!] begin with the lifting of the body, so that as you advance all the part which was visible when on guard is taken out of presence and the adversary's sword passes in empty air. It shows that you must hit the adversary at the same moment, recover the right foot at once and return on guard in case he has not passed or had not meant to pass. After completing this stroke you could follow with the left foot turning it backwards and continuing to the adversary's body, if he had not passed, as we said; for if he had passed the first stroke would have sufficed.</p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 809: Line 823:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 18.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 18.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 019.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 019.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[37] <br/><br/></p>
 +
 
 +
<p>This is another extension in ''quarte'', made with a turn of the left foot. It may be used in the ''time'' when your adversary tries to hit on the inside in ''tierce'' or ''seconde'', or to pass below. You can similarly make use of it if he offers a ''time'' when on guard. But it must be accompanied by a movement of the feet, so that he cannot break ground, while you are trying to hit. Otherwise you would be hit, as you would also if you gave your adversary time to change line. For in turning in this manner, if your first plan fails, you can form no other. Therefore you should not turn unless you are certain that you are so far advanced, that with the first movement of the feet the body can pass the adversary's point, for otherwise you would be easily hit in the back. After turning the left foot it is well to follow right on to his body in order to get entirely out of presence and in order that he may not withdraw his sword and return to hit you. If your adversary passes it will be unnecessary to do anything but the turn in order to get out of line and escape the impact of his sword. In this case you would be more successful, as you could not be deceived.</p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 823: Line 839:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 20.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 20.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 020.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 020.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[38] </p>
 +
 
 +
<p>This extension in ''quarte'', advancing with the left foot, shows how the foot should be carried and the body inclined in order to make the lunge as long as if made with the right foot; it shows too how to carry the body out of line, so that the sword may defend better. This is certainly a better method of attacking, because you can change from one line to another as you advance, and form a new plan. But it requires a good knowledge of weak and strong points, because it is not a question of avoiding with the body, but of dropping under the adversary's sword. Moreover, in any case you defend with the ''forte'' of the sword according to opportunity. This method of hitting is more vivacious and the sword is stronger than in any other method of hitting in ''quarte''.</p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/></p>
Line 836: Line 854:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 21.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 21.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 021.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 021.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[39] <br/><br/></p>
 +
 
 +
<p>This plate illustrates the first hit in ''quarte''. It is a lunge against a guard in ''tierce''. It may arise as follows. The adversary, who is in ''tierce'' has made a feint of hitting on the inside, whilst you also were in ''tierce''. He has come forward in order to make you parry. But you have taken the ''time'', carried your hilt up to his point and driven on your point to make a hit. By advancing the right foot, bending the body and turning your hand into ''quarte'', you have encountered and hit your adversary, as may be seen, at the moment of his coming forward. He has not been able to parry, while his foot was in the air and he was advancing. Similarly it may happen that you both are in ''tierce'' on the outside, and the adversary has tried to disengage to the inside line, advancing his sword and body to force you to parry, with the intention of hitting you in that ''time'' by changing from ''tierce'' to ''seconde'', and lowering his body; or he intended to return to the outside in ''tierce'' in order to hit over the sword. Both these methods would have been effective, if you had done what he desired. But you, being steady on your guard, with your sword free, within wide distance, were awaiting the ''time'' in order to hit or seize some advantage. As soon as you saw the movement of his sword and body bringing him forward, you realised that although he had not moved his feet, he still could not break ground, since it is impossible to advance and retire at one moment. Hence you may realise the great danger of moving without a ''time'', in order to advance, when you are already within wide distance, especially when the adversary's sword is free. If you are forced to move in order to free yourself from some danger it is better to retire than to advance, especially if your adversary is steady on his guard, and thus free yourself in such a manner, that if your adversary attempts to hit in that ''time'', you can defend yourself and attack at the same instant. Even if you have moved your sword and body, provided that your feet are steady, you can always save yourself when within wide distance. But within close distance the smallest movement involves great danger, as we showed in treating of distances and ''times''. Further you must consider that, while your adversary's sword is free and steady, to make a feint, in our judgment, is merely to hurry fruitlessly. If your adversary makes a feint, he can never hit, even though you parry, as long as you are steady on your feet,[!] If after a feint he tries to hit, you can break ground, so that he will not reach, and will be thrown into disorder with danger of being hit before he recovers. Therefore to make a feint you must await some movement of your adversary, or not his sword free, but engage it first, so that he cannot hit in that line. Afterwards you can feint, without abandoning your advantage. In making this feint you must go forward, so that if he does not parry, the feint will hit, and if he parries, you can by a change of line reach his body, before he can save himself by breaking ground. For the one who has moved with the feint will arrive more quickly than the one who has awaited the second ''time'' in order to break ground. If when you make the feint, your adversary breaks ground, you must not advance, for you are too far away. You must stop and return to the engagement. If the one who has been hit in the present case, had observed that principle sooner, he would have been the hitter rather than the hit, or would at least have saved himself. We have made a long discourse on this present hit with respect to its advantages and dangers, and not only that, but the manner of its arising, and how else it might arise, and how he who was hit might have found safety. For before the attack many remedies were possible, though they were of no avail after the thing was done. But in the following hits we shall state only the cause and the effect, leaving the rest, lest the reader should be wearied.</p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 863: Line 883:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 22.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 22.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 022.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 022.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[40] <br/><br/></p>
 +
 
 +
<p>The second hit is in ''tierce'' against a guard in ''tierce''. It may arise when you finding yourself on the inside, have made a feint in the straight line and your adversary in parrying has dropped his sword through not meeting yours, for you have disengaged in the ''time'' of his parrying. You have gone on to hit on the outside through the angle naturally formed by the hand in ''tierce'', and the adversary has been unable to push your sword away as his ''forte'' was already so far advanced that his sword remained locked. Or it might arise in this way both being in ''tierce'' on the inside, you have advanced to engage his sword. He has tried to disengage, advancing his right foot. In that ''time'' you have pushed on and made a hit before the disengage and the movement of the foot were completed, in such a manner that his point has been pushed outwards, before he could return it into line. It is obvious that the ''time'' offered by the disengage from one line to the other, being a larger movement, is longer than the ''time'' offered by one who remains in the centre line and goes straight on. Therefore, you may say that you have arrived before he has finished the disengage, and in this manner have pushed him out of the line as the plate shows.</p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 876: Line 898:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 23.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 23.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 023.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 023.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[41] </p>
 +
 
 +
<p>This is a hit in ''quarte'' against a tierce. It has succeeded because both were in tierce within wide distance, and you have moved your sword and tried to engage the adversary's on the inside. He, seeing your plan and that you were uncovered below the sword hand, has lowered his point in order to hit in ''tierce'' in that line. But you, who have moved the point only, seeing him coming in below, have abandoned the attempt to engage and directed your point at his body, turning your hand into ''quarte''. By carrying the hilt to his ''faible'' you have parried and hit at the same moment. This has been due to your adversary's ignorance, for he has failed to realise that your movement was so small, that he could not arrive before the ''time'' was finished. Therefore he should not have gone on. But it was good to lower the point in this manner, if only he had not advanced or moved his feet. For then against this hit he could readily have defended himself and attacked in various ways.</p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/></p>
Line 891: Line 915:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 24.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 24.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 024.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 024.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[42] <br/><br/></p>
 +
 
 +
<p>This is a hit in ''tierce'' against another ''tierce''. Both were on the outside, and you have moved to engage your adversary's sword. He, seeing the time, without considering the width of the distance, and that you have moved the point only, has advanced his foot in order to disengage on the inside and hit in ''quarte'', or in order to engage your sword, and has advanced within close distance. You had moved with the intention merely of making him move. Seeing that he was beginning to drop his point to disengage it and that he was advancing his foot, you also have let your point drop; lowered the body and have met his ''faible'' with the hilt and prevented his disengage. At the same moment you have pushed on with the right foot and hit under his sword on the outside. Therefore it should be held as a true principle, that when your adversary's sword is free and he is steady on his feet and has tried to engage, you should not allow this danger to arise, but should form a plan to acquire some advantage without advancing, but rather retiring. For the movement of the foot is longer than the movement of the sword. But in the case when you have engaged your adversary's sword and he has tried to free it, even without moving his feet, then you can advance a foot and engage on the other side, in order to hit when he moves again. Therefore the principle of advancing when your adversary moves rests on the advantage of having first engaged his sword. If it is free, it puts you in danger, as the plate shows.</p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 911: Line 937:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 25.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 25.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 025.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 025.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[43] </p>
 +
 
 +
<p>This represents a hit with the guard in ''prime'' against a ''tierce''. Both the combatants were in ''tierce'' on the outside, and have attacked each other's swords and have begun to push one against the other. You have turned your hand from ''tierce'' to ''prime''. This guard naturally tends to hit towards the ground and is strong in the lower lines. In this manner, as you have raised your hand, your adversary's sword is left below in your strongest line. Further in raising the hand you have approached his ''faible'' and at the same moment have pushed on and made the hit shown. You could have made this same at-tack and with less effort, if his guard had been in ''seconde'', since, although that ''seconde'' covers the part hit better, still it is weaker, and therefore the ''prime'' would have overcome it more readily than the ''tierce''. This hit arises out of a tussle with the swords. In this connection you should bear in mind that it is bad to resist one who forces your sword; it is better to yield and release your sword, since the sword which tries force is bound to fall a great deal, when the other sword yields, which gives you a ''time'' to hit or seize some advantage over the falling sword. This is a safer and less fatiguing method, as we have said.</p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/></p>
Line 926: Line 954:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 26.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 26.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 026.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 026.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[44] <br/><br/></p>
 +
 
 +
<p>This is a hit in ''quarte'' against a sword in the air. Both were on the outside and you have tried to engage your adversary's sword, which may have been in ''tierce'' or in ''seconde''. He has raised his sword to make a cut of ''mandiritto'' at the head. You were already moving in ''quarte'' in order to engage his sword and have merely lunged forward, advancing the right foot in such a way as to arrive before his sword fell. Even if his sword had fallen, it would have effected[!] nothing, because in lunging you have raised your hand far enough to protect the head from the cut. As the cut is made from the elbow, it has left much uncovered, is slow in hitting and has led to this hit. If the cut had been made from the wrist, in the ''time'' of your hitting the sword would have fallen on yours, so that both the attack and the defence would have been illustrated together. But as that did not happen, the attack only is shown here.</p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 942: Line 972:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 27.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 27.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 027.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 027.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[45] <br/><br/></p>
 +
 
 +
<p>This is a hit in ''seconde'' against a sword in ''tierce'', whose point is out of line; it has arisen in this manner: both were in ''tierce'' on the inside and you have tried to engage the adversary's sword. At that moment he has turned his sword to make a cut of ''riverso'' through the uncovered part seen outside the sword towards the head and shoulder. Seeing his sword making a circle you have changed from ''tierce'' to ''seconde'', covered the threatened part, and in the same ''time'' driven on your point, arriving before his circle was finished. Even had his sword fallen first, he would have met the parry. All this arises from the slowness of the cut, which you cannot make without getting out of line, and the ''time'' before you return in to line, is so long, that one who uses the point may easily arrive first.</p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 957: Line 989:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 28.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 28.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 028.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 028.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[46] <br/><br/></p>
 +
 
 +
<p>This is a hit in ''tierce'' on a straight line against a ''tierce'' which has fallen. Both were in ''tierce'' on the outside. You have tried to engage the adversary's sword, being within wide distance, and he has taken that ''time'' and made a cut of ''mandiritto'' at the head. You have withdrawn your body slightly, have let his sword pass in the air, and merely lowering the point a little when his sword has passed, have suddenly thrust in ''tierce'', reaching his body at the moment when his sword has competely[!] fallen, so that he has been unable to raise his sword in order to parry or to retreat, or save himself, because his movement was not yet finished, when he was hit. From this you may deduce the principle that, when possible, it is always better to let cuts pass without parrying them, so that you may not be put into subjection and the danger of being deceived while parrying. Further this method is less fatiguing.</p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 972: Line 1,006:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 29.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 29.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 029.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 029.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[47] <br/><br/></p>
 +
 
 +
<p>This hit in ''quarte'' against a ''tierce'' which has fallen has arisen as follows: you have tried to engage whilst both were in ''tierce'' on the inside, and your adversary has taken the ''time'' and made a cut in ''riverso'' at the head, but being too far distant he has failed to reach. You realised that his cut could not reach and allowed his sword to pass without parrying, and by lowering your point a little so that his sword might not touch it, as soon as his sword had passed you have hit in ''quarte'', being defended in that place where the cut of ''riverso'', after falling, generally hits, especially if it has fallen without effect. Your point has reached his body at the moment when the ''riverso'' has finished its fall, in such a way that he who has made the cut has been unable to save himself, because he has been carried forward by his own blow, and therefore has given you a chance to hit him. If his arm had been straighter and in better alignment, he could have defended better. This is the result of the sword missing its object, which, as we have said elsewhere, always brings more or less disorder. The cut made from the wrist gives more protection.</p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 988: Line 1,024:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 30.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 30.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 030.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 030.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[48] <br/><br/></p>
 +
 
 +
<p>This cut of ''mandiritto'' at the head, which is here shown, against a ''tierce'' may arise in this manner: you have engaged your adversary's sword, and he has not moved. The swords being engaged on the outside, he has tried to force your sword, and you, feeling the pressure, have yielded, and by bending the wrist, and keeping your hilt close to his sword, have made the cut shown. He has been unable to parry, because, owing to your yielding, his sword has fallen a little, in such a manner that your ''forte'', has weighed upon his blade and prevented him from raising it. It may arise also in this way: both being in ''tierce'' on the inside, you have tried to engage and your adversary has disengaged in ''tierce'', carrying himself forward in order to hit on the outside. But you have let his point drop, bent your wrist, bringing the hilt over his blade, and thus have made the cut of mandiritto. As may be seen your hand has fallen into ''tierce''.</p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 1,004: Line 1,042:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 36.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 36.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 031.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 031.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[49] <br/><br/></p>
 +
 
 +
<p>This hit in ''quarte'' against a ''seconde'' has arisen as follows:- both were in ''tierce'' on the outside, and you have lowered your point and uncovered the outside in order to give your adversary an opportunity to attempt a hit. He, thinking you have moved in order to change position, has come in to the part uncovered, thinking that he could hit by changing from ''tierce'' to ''seconde'' so as to exclude your sword on the outside, and carrying his right foot forward. You, seeing him coming, have not parried, but turned the body with the left foot; at the same time disengaging on the inside and changing the hand to ''quarte'' you have made the hit. The hit might also have arisen in this way: both being in tierce on the inside, you have tried to engage; he has disengaged before you could find his sword, and changed his hand into ''seconde'' in order to cover himself and hit you on the outside in the ''time'' when you were seeking his blade. This would have succeeded, if you had tried to parry. But thinking that you could not defend by a parry of the sword, which was moving in order to engage his sword, you have continued the movement followed his disengage, and by making a counter-disengage, turning your body out of presence and letting his sword pass, you have hit at the moment of his advance.</p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 1,020: Line 1,060:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 32.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 32.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 032.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 032.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[50] </p>
 +
 
 +
<p>Now follows another hit in ''quarte'' on the outside of the adversary's sword, which is in ''tierce'' at an angle. This has arisen as follows: both being on the inside, and the adversary in ''tierce'' at an angle, you have tried to engage his sword and he has disengaged in ''tierce'' on the outside. In the same ''time'' you have changed your hand to ''quarte'' without extending the arm, but carrying the hand away to the inside and as high as the shoulder. You have moved the right foot forward turning it in the air in such a manner that the turn is seen to be completed as it reaches the ground, thereby turning the body and bringing out of line all the part opposed to the adversary. You also have made an angle of your sword, which has entered the angle formed by the adversary, as shown. In this way the more the adversary tries to push it away, the stronger is the hit. Or your adversary may have tried to engage in ''tierce'' on the outside, your sword being in ''seconde''; you have yielded from ''seconde'' to ''quarte'', turning the body, and hit at the moment when your adversary expected to engage your sword.</p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/></p>
Line 1,037: Line 1,079:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 33.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 33.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 033.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 033.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[51] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 1,054: Line 1,096:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 34.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 34.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 034.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 034.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[52] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 1,068: Line 1,110:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 35.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 35.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 035.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 035.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[53] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 1,082: Line 1,124:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 31.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 31.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 036.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 036.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[54] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 1,097: Line 1,139:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 37.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 37.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 037.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 037.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[55] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 1,113: Line 1,155:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 38.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 38.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 038.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 038.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[56] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 1,128: Line 1,170:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 39.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 39.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 039.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 039.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[57] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 1,148: Line 1,190:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 40.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 40.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 040.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 040.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[58] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 1,168: Line 1,210:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 41.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 41.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 041.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 041.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[59] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/><br/></p>
Line 1,186: Line 1,228:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 42.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 42.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 042.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 042.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[60] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 1,202: Line 1,244:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 43.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 43.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 043.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 043.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[61] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 1,219: Line 1,261:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 45.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 45.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 044.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 044.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[62] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 1,235: Line 1,277:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 44.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 44.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 045.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 045.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[63] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 1,255: Line 1,297:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 46.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 46.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 046.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 046.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[64] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 1,273: Line 1,315:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 47.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 47.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 047.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 047.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[65] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 1,287: Line 1,329:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 48.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 1 detail 48.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 048.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 048.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[66] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
 
| <p><br/><br/></p>
Line 1,303: Line 1,345:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[67] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,331: Line 1,373:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,342: Line 1,384:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/87|2|lbl=-}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/87|2|lbl=-}}
Line 1,352: Line 1,394:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/87|3|lbl=-}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/87|3|lbl=-}}
Line 1,362: Line 1,404:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,373: Line 1,415:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,384: Line 1,426:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,395: Line 1,437:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|94|lbl=84}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|94|lbl=84}}
Line 1,405: Line 1,447:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 01.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 01.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 049.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 049.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|95|lbl=85}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|95|lbl=85}}
Line 1,415: Line 1,457:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 12.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 12.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 050.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 050.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|96|lbl=86}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|96|lbl=86}}
Line 1,425: Line 1,467:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 19.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 19.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 051.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 051.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|97|lbl=87}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|97|lbl=87}}
Line 1,435: Line 1,477:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 02.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 02.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 052.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 052.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|98|lbl=88}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|98|lbl=88}}
Line 1,445: Line 1,487:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 05.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 05.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 053.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 053.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/99|1|lbl=89}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/99|1|lbl=89}}
Line 1,455: Line 1,497:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 13.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 13.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 054.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 054.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,466: Line 1,508:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 16.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 16.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 055.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 055.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/101|1|lbl=91}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/101|1|lbl=91}}
Line 1,476: Line 1,518:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 11.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 11.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 056.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 056.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,487: Line 1,529:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 17.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 17.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 057.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 057.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,498: Line 1,540:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 20.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 20.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 058.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 058.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,509: Line 1,551:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 08.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 08.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 059.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 059.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,520: Line 1,562:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 03.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 03.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 060.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 060.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,531: Line 1,573:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 06.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 06.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 061.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 061.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,542: Line 1,584:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 07.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 07.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 062.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 062.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/107|2|lbl=-}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/107|2|lbl=-}}
Line 1,552: Line 1,594:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 14.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 14.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 063.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 063.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|108|lbl=98}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|108|lbl=98}}
Line 1,562: Line 1,604:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 10.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 10.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 064.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 064.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,573: Line 1,615:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 18.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 18.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 065.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 065.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,584: Line 1,626:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 21.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 21.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 066.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 066.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|112|lbl=102}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|112|lbl=102}}
Line 1,594: Line 1,636:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 04.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 04.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 067.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 067.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,605: Line 1,647:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 09.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 09.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 068.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 068.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/114|2|lbl=-}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/114|2|lbl=-}}
Line 1,615: Line 1,657:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 15.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 15.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 069.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 069.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|115|lbl=105}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|115|lbl=105}}
Line 1,625: Line 1,667:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 22.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 22.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 070.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 070.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|116|lbl=106}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|116|lbl=106}}
Line 1,635: Line 1,677:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 23.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 23.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 071.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 071.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,646: Line 1,688:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 26.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 26.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 072.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 072.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,657: Line 1,699:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 31.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 31.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 073.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 073.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,668: Line 1,710:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 30.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 30.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 074.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 074.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,679: Line 1,721:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 33.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 33.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 075.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 075.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,690: Line 1,732:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 28.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 28.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 076.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 076.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/122|2|lbl=-|p=1}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/122|2|lbl=-|p=1}}
Line 1,700: Line 1,742:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 29.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 29.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 077.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 077.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|123|lbl=113}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|123|lbl=113}}
Line 1,710: Line 1,752:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 27.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 27.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 078.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 078.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|124|lbl=114}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|124|lbl=114}}
Line 1,720: Line 1,762:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 24.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 24.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 079.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 079.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|125|lbl=115}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|125|lbl=115}}
Line 1,730: Line 1,772:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 35.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 35.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 080.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 080.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|126|lbl=116}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|126|lbl=116}}
Line 1,740: Line 1,782:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 38.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 38.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 081.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 081.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|127|lbl=117}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|127|lbl=117}}
Line 1,750: Line 1,792:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 32.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 32.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 082.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 082.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|128|lbl=118}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|128|lbl=118}}
Line 1,760: Line 1,802:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 37.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 37.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 083.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 083.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|129|lbl=119}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|129|lbl=119}}
Line 1,770: Line 1,812:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 36.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 36.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 084.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 084.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|130|lbl=120}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|130|lbl=120}}
Line 1,780: Line 1,822:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 39.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 39.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 085.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 085.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|131|lbl=121}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|131|lbl=121}}
Line 1,790: Line 1,832:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 34.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 34.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 086.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 086.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|132|lbl=122}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|132|lbl=122}}
Line 1,800: Line 1,842:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 40.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 40.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 087.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 087.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|133|lbl=123}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|133|lbl=123}}
Line 1,810: Line 1,852:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 42.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 42.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 088.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 088.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|134|lbl=124}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|134|lbl=124}}
Line 1,820: Line 1,862:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 43.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 43.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 089.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 089.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|135|lbl=125}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|135|lbl=125}}
Line 1,830: Line 1,872:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 47.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 47.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 090.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 090.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|136|lbl=126}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|136|lbl=126}}
Line 1,840: Line 1,882:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 25.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 25.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 091.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 091.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,851: Line 1,893:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 45.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 45.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 092.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 092.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/138|2|lbl=-|p=1}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/138|2|lbl=-|p=1}}
Line 1,861: Line 1,903:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 41.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 41.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 093.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 093.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,872: Line 1,914:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 44.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 44.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 094.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 094.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,883: Line 1,925:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 48.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 48.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 095.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 095.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,894: Line 1,936:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 46.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 46.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 096.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 096.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,904: Line 1,946:
 
|-  
 
|-  
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 49.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 49.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| <p><small>[113r]</small> {{gold|b=1|V}}edeßi qui una ferita di seconda sopra il pugniale qual’è contra una mano voltata verso la quarta, & è avenuta, per’che quello che á ferito era nella terza sopra il piece manco & á finto di ferire sotto il braccio del’pugniale inemico, & questo abbaßato la mano di eßo per’parare, & si è cacciato nel’mezo delle arme á ferire di meza quarta, & quello che á fatto la finta appreßo quel’tempo cavando sopra detto pugniale voltando la mano in seconda, appoggiando il pugniale alla nemica ponta schorrendo il filo di eßa è paßato con il piede dritto tanto innanzi, Come si vede, per’che la detta quardia porta con se tal’ragione; potrebbe anchor’eßer’stato che questo, che era nel’piede manco sia andato á ritrovare, la nemica di dentro, la qual’doveva eßere in terza & quello averà cavato per’non lasciarsi occupare mà ferire in quel’tempo, & questo in quel’medesimo punta á cavato anchora lui di seconda, & posto il pugniale alla nemica che veniva á ferire & è paßato di piedi dritto dove è arrivato innanzi che quello, che aveva pri= <small>[114v]</small> ma fatto la distesa di terza abbi potuto fenire di voltare la mano in quarta.</p>
 
| <p><small>[113r]</small> {{gold|b=1|V}}edeßi qui una ferita di seconda sopra il pugniale qual’è contra una mano voltata verso la quarta, & è avenuta, per’che quello che á ferito era nella terza sopra il piece manco & á finto di ferire sotto il braccio del’pugniale inemico, & questo abbaßato la mano di eßo per’parare, & si è cacciato nel’mezo delle arme á ferire di meza quarta, & quello che á fatto la finta appreßo quel’tempo cavando sopra detto pugniale voltando la mano in seconda, appoggiando il pugniale alla nemica ponta schorrendo il filo di eßa è paßato con il piede dritto tanto innanzi, Come si vede, per’che la detta quardia porta con se tal’ragione; potrebbe anchor’eßer’stato che questo, che era nel’piede manco sia andato á ritrovare, la nemica di dentro, la qual’doveva eßere in terza & quello averà cavato per’non lasciarsi occupare mà ferire in quel’tempo, & questo in quel’medesimo punta á cavato anchora lui di seconda, & posto il pugniale alla nemica che veniva á ferire & è paßato di piedi dritto dove è arrivato innanzi che quello, che aveva pri= <small>[114v]</small> ma fatto la distesa di terza abbi potuto fenire di voltare la mano in quarta.</p>
Line 1,933: Line 1,975:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 1,944: Line 1,986:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 50.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 50.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 097.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 097.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/147|2|lbl=-}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/147|2|lbl=-}}
Line 1,954: Line 1,996:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 51.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 51.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 098.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 098.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|148|lbl=138}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|148|lbl=138}}
Line 1,964: Line 2,006:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 52.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 52.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 099.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 099.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|149|lbl=139}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|149|lbl=139}}
Line 1,974: Line 2,016:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 53.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 53.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 100.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 100.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|150|lbl=140}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|150|lbl=140}}
Line 1,984: Line 2,026:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 54.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 54.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 101.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 101.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|151|lbl=141}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|151|lbl=141}}
Line 1,994: Line 2,036:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 58.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 58.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 102.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 102.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|152|lbl=142}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|152|lbl=142}}
Line 2,004: Line 2,046:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 56.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 56.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 103.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 103.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|153|lbl=143}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|153|lbl=143}}
Line 2,014: Line 2,056:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 57.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 57.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 104.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 104.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|154|lbl=144}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|154|lbl=144}}
Line 2,024: Line 2,066:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 59.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 59.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 105.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 105.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|155|lbl=145}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|155|lbl=145}}
Line 2,034: Line 2,076:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 60.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 60.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 106.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 106.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|156|lbl=146}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|156|lbl=146}}
Line 2,044: Line 2,086:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 55.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 55.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 107.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 107.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|157|lbl=147}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|157|lbl=147}}
Line 2,054: Line 2,096:
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 61.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:GKS 1868 2 detail 61.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 108.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 108.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|158|lbl=148}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|158|lbl=148}}
Line 2,064: Line 2,106:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|159|lbl=149}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|159|lbl=149}}
Line 2,098: Line 2,140:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[File:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) Portrait 2.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[File:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) Portrait 2.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|161|lbl=151}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|161|lbl=151}}
Line 2,109: Line 2,151:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 2,122: Line 2,164:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 2,140: Line 2,182:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/165|1|lbl=155}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/165|1|lbl=155}}
Line 2,155: Line 2,197:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 2,167: Line 2,209:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 109.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 109.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/167|2|lbl=-}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/167|2|lbl=-}}
Line 2,180: Line 2,222:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 110.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 110.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|168|lbl=158}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|168|lbl=158}}
Line 2,191: Line 2,233:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 111.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 111.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 2,203: Line 2,245:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 112.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 112.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 2,215: Line 2,257:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 113.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 113.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 2,227: Line 2,269:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 114.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 114.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/172|2|lbl=-|p=1}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/172|2|lbl=-|p=1}}
Line 2,238: Line 2,280:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 115.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 115.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|173|lbl=163}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|173|lbl=163}}
Line 2,249: Line 2,291:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 116.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 116.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|174|lbl=164}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|174|lbl=164}}
Line 2,260: Line 2,302:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 2,272: Line 2,314:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 117.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 117.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/177|1|lbl=167|p=1}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/177|1|lbl=167|p=1}}
Line 2,283: Line 2,325:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 118.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 118.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 2,295: Line 2,337:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 119.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 119.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 2,307: Line 2,349:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 120.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 120.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|179|lbl=169}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|179|lbl=169}}
Line 2,318: Line 2,360:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 121.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 121.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|180|lbl=170}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|180|lbl=170}}
Line 2,329: Line 2,371:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 122.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 122.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|181|lbl=171}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|181|lbl=171}}
Line 2,340: Line 2,382:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 123.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 123.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|182|lbl=172}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|182|lbl=172}}
Line 2,351: Line 2,393:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 2,363: Line 2,405:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 124.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 124.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 2,375: Line 2,417:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 125.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 125.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|186|lbl=176}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|186|lbl=176}}
Line 2,386: Line 2,428:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 126.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 126.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|187|lbl=177}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|187|lbl=177}}
Line 2,397: Line 2,439:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 127.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 127.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|188|lbl=178}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|188|lbl=178}}
Line 2,408: Line 2,450:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 128.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 128.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|189|lbl=179}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|189|lbl=179}}
Line 2,419: Line 2,461:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 129.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 129.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|190|lbl=180}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|190|lbl=180}}
Line 2,430: Line 2,472:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 2,442: Line 2,484:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 130.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 130.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 2,454: Line 2,496:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 131.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 131.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 2,466: Line 2,508:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 132.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 132.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/194|2|lbl=-|p=1}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/194|2|lbl=-|p=1}}
Line 2,477: Line 2,519:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 133.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 133.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|195|lbl=185}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|195|lbl=185}}
Line 2,488: Line 2,530:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 134.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 134.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|196|lbl=186}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|196|lbl=186}}
Line 2,499: Line 2,541:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 135.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 135.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|197|lbl=187}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|197|lbl=187}}
Line 2,510: Line 2,552:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 136.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 136.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|198|lbl=188}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|198|lbl=188}}
Line 2,521: Line 2,563:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 137.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 137.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|199|lbl=189}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|199|lbl=189}}
Line 2,532: Line 2,574:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 138.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 138.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|200|lbl=190}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|200|lbl=190}}
Line 2,543: Line 2,585:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 139.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 139.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|201|lbl=191}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|201|lbl=191}}
Line 2,554: Line 2,596:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 140.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 140.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|202|lbl=192}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|202|lbl=192}}
Line 2,565: Line 2,607:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 141.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 141.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|203|lbl=193}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|203|lbl=193}}
Line 2,576: Line 2,618:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 2,588: Line 2,630:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 142.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 142.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/206|1|lbl=196|p=1}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/206|1|lbl=196|p=1}}
Line 2,599: Line 2,641:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 143.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 143.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 2,611: Line 2,653:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 144.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 144.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/207|2|lbl=-}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/207|2|lbl=-}}
Line 2,622: Line 2,664:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 145.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 145.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|208|lbl=198}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|208|lbl=198}}
Line 2,633: Line 2,675:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 146.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 146.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|209|lbl=199}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|209|lbl=199}}
Line 2,644: Line 2,686:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 147.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 147.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|210|lbl=200}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|210|lbl=200}}
Line 2,655: Line 2,697:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 148.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 148.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|211|lbl=201}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|211|lbl=201}}
Line 2,666: Line 2,708:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 149.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 149.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|212|lbl=202}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|212|lbl=202}}
Line 2,677: Line 2,719:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 150.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 150.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|213|lbl=203}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|213|lbl=203}}
Line 2,688: Line 2,730:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 2,700: Line 2,742:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 151.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 151.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/216|2|lbl=-|p=1}} {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/217|1|lbl=207|p=1}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/216|2|lbl=-|p=1}} {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/217|1|lbl=207|p=1}}
Line 2,711: Line 2,753:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 152.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 152.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/217|2|lbl=-}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/217|2|lbl=-}}
Line 2,722: Line 2,764:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 153.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 153.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|218|lbl=208}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|218|lbl=208}}
Line 2,733: Line 2,775:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 154.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 154.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|219|lbl=209}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|219|lbl=209}}
Line 2,744: Line 2,786:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 155.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 155.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|220|lbl=210}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|220|lbl=210}}
Line 2,755: Line 2,797:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 156.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 156.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 2,786: Line 2,828:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|223|lbl=213}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|223|lbl=213}}
Line 2,797: Line 2,839:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 2,809: Line 2,851:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 157.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 157.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/225|2|lbl=-}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/225|2|lbl=-}}
Line 2,820: Line 2,862:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 158.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 158.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|226|lbl=216}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|226|lbl=216}}
Line 2,831: Line 2,873:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 159.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 159.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|227|lbl=217}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|227|lbl=217}}
Line 2,842: Line 2,884:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 2,854: Line 2,896:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 160.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 160.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/229|2|lbl=-}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/229|2|lbl=-}}
Line 2,865: Line 2,907:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 161.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 161.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|230|lbl=220}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|230|lbl=220}}
Line 2,876: Line 2,918:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 162.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 162.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|231|lbl=221}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|231|lbl=221}}
Line 2,887: Line 2,929:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 163.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 163.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|232|lbl=222}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|232|lbl=222}}
Line 2,898: Line 2,940:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 2,910: Line 2,952:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 164.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 164.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/235|2|lbl=-}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/235|2|lbl=-}}
Line 2,921: Line 2,963:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 165.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 165.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|236|lbl=226}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|236|lbl=226}}
Line 2,932: Line 2,974:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 166.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 166.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|237|lbl=227}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|237|lbl=227}}
Line 2,943: Line 2,985:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 167.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 167.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|238|lbl=228}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|238|lbl=228}}
Line 2,954: Line 2,996:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 168.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 168.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|239|lbl=229}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|239|lbl=229}}
Line 2,965: Line 3,007:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 169.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 169.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|240|lbl=230}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|240|lbl=230}}
Line 2,976: Line 3,018:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 170.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 170.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|241|lbl=231}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|241|lbl=231}}
Line 2,987: Line 3,029:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 171.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 171.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|242|lbl=232}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|242|lbl=232}}
Line 2,998: Line 3,040:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|243|lbl=233|p=1}} {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|244|lbl=234|p=1}} {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/245|1|lbl=235|p=1}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|243|lbl=233|p=1}} {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|244|lbl=234|p=1}} {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/245|1|lbl=235|p=1}}
Line 3,009: Line 3,051:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 172.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 172.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/245|2|lbl=-}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/245|2|lbl=-}}
Line 3,020: Line 3,062:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 173.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 173.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|246|lbl=236|p=1}} {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/247|1|lbl=237|p=1}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|246|lbl=236|p=1}} {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/247|1|lbl=237|p=1}}
Line 3,031: Line 3,073:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 174.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 174.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/247|2|lbl=-|p=1}} {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/248|1|lbl=238|p=1}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/247|2|lbl=-|p=1}} {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/248|1|lbl=238|p=1}}
Line 3,042: Line 3,084:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 175.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 175.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/248|2|lbl=-}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/248|2|lbl=-}}
Line 3,053: Line 3,095:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 176.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 176.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|249|lbl=239}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|249|lbl=239}}
Line 3,064: Line 3,106:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 177.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 177.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|250|lbl=240}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|250|lbl=240}}
Line 3,075: Line 3,117:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 178.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 178.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|251|lbl=241|p=1}} {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|252|lbl=242|p=1}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|251|lbl=241|p=1}} {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|252|lbl=242|p=1}}
Line 3,105: Line 3,147:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|253|lbl=243}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|253|lbl=243}}
Line 3,116: Line 3,158:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 179.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 179.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|254|lbl=244}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|254|lbl=244}}
Line 3,127: Line 3,169:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 180.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 180.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|255|lbl=245}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|255|lbl=245}}
Line 3,138: Line 3,180:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 181.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 181.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|256|lbl=246}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|256|lbl=246}}
Line 3,149: Line 3,191:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 182.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 182.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|257|lbl=247}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|257|lbl=247}}
Line 3,160: Line 3,202:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 183.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 183.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|258|lbl=248}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|258|lbl=248}}
Line 3,171: Line 3,213:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 184.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 184.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|259|lbl=249}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|259|lbl=249}}
Line 3,182: Line 3,224:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/260|1|lbl=250}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/260|1|lbl=250}}
Line 3,193: Line 3,235:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 185.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 185.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/260|2|lbl=-}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/260|2|lbl=-}}
Line 3,204: Line 3,246:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 186.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 186.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|261|lbl=251}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|261|lbl=251}}
Line 3,215: Line 3,257:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 187.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 187.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|262|lbl=252}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|262|lbl=252}}
Line 3,226: Line 3,268:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 188.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 188.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|263|lbl=253}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|263|lbl=253}}
Line 3,237: Line 3,279:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 189.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 189.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|264|lbl=254}}
 
| {{pagetb|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf|264|lbl=254}}
Line 3,248: Line 3,290:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 190.jpg|400px|center]]
 
| [[file:Scienza d’Arme (Fabris) 190.jpg|400px|center]]
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 3,260: Line 3,302:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/266|2|lbl=-}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/266|2|lbl=-}}
Line 3,271: Line 3,313:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
|  
+
| <p>[] </p>
 
|  
 
|  
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/266|3|lbl=-}}
 
| {{section|Page:Scienza d’Arme (Salvator Fabris) 1606.pdf/266|3|lbl=-}}

Revision as of 21:36, 30 April 2022

Salvator Fabris
200px
Born 1544
Padua, Italy
Died 11 Nov 1618 (aged 74)
Padua, Italy
Occupation
Nationality Italian
Alma mater University of Padua (?)
Patron
  • Christianus IV of Denmark
  • Johan Frederik of Schleswig-
    Holstein-Gottorp
Influenced
Genres Fencing manual
Language Italian
Notable work(s) Scienza d’Arme (1606)
Manuscript(s)
Translations

Salvator Fabris (Salvador Fabbri, Salvator Fabriz, Fabrice; 1544-1618) was a 16th – 17th century Italian knight and fencing master. He was born in or around Padua, Italy in 1544, and although little is known about his early years, he seems to have studied fencing from a young age and possibly attended the prestigious University of Padua.[citation needed] The French master Henry de Sainct Didier recounts a meeting with an Italian fencer named "Fabrice" during the course of preparing his treatise (completed in 1573) in which they debated fencing theory, potentially placing Fabris in France in the early 1570s.[1] In the 1580s, Fabris corresponded with Christian Barnekow, a Danish nobleman with ties to the royal court as well as an alumnus of the university.[2] It seems likely that Fabris traveled a great deal during the 1570s and 80s, spending time in France, Germany, Spain, and possibly other regions before returning to teach at his alma mater.[citation needed]

It is unclear if Fabris himself was of noble birth, but at some point he seems to have earned a knighthood. In fact, he is described in his treatise as Supremus Eques ("Supreme Knight") of the Order of the Seven Hearts. In Johann Joachim Hynitzsch's introduction to the 1676 edition, he identifies Fabris as a Colonel of the Order.[3] It seems therefore that he was not only a knight of the Order of the Seven Hearts, but rose to a high rank and perhaps even overall leadership.

Fabris' whereabouts in the 1590s are uncertain, but there are rumors. In 1594, he may have been hired by King Sigismund of Poland to assassinate his uncle Karl, a Swedish duke and competitor for the Swedish crown. According to the story, Fabris participated in a sword dance (or possibly a dramatic play) with a sharp sword and was to slay Karl during the performance when the audience was distracted. (The duke was warned and avoided the event, saving his life.)[4] In ca. 1599, Fabris may have been invited to England by noted playwright William Shakespeare to choreograph the fight scenes in his premier of Hamlet.[5][2] He also presumably spent considerable time in the 1590s developing the fencing manual that would guarantee his lasting fame.

What is certain is that by 1598, Fabris had left his position at the University of Padua and was attached to the court of Johan Frederik, the young duke of Schleswig-Holstein-Gottorp. He continued in the duke's service until 1601, and as a parting gift prepared a lavishly-illustrated, three-volume manuscript of his treatise entitled Scientia e Prattica dell'Arme (GI.kgl.Saml.1868 4040).[2]

In 1601, Fabris was hired as chief rapier instructor to the court of Christianus IV, King of Denmark and Duke Johan Frederik's cousin. He ultimately served in the royal court for five years; toward the end of his tenure and at the king's insistence, he published his opus under the title Sienza e Pratica d’Arme ("Science and Practice of Arms") or De lo Schermo, overo Scienza d’Arme ("On Defense, or the Science of Arms"). Christianus funded this first edition and placed his court artist, Jan van Halbeeck, at Fabris' disposal to illustrate it; it was ultimately published in Copenhagen on 25 September 1606.[2]

Soon after the text was published, and perhaps feeling his 62 years, Fabris asked to be released from his six-year contract with the king so that he might return home. He traveled through northern Germany and was in Paris, France, in 1608. Ultimately, he received a position at the University of Padua and there passed his final years. He died of a fever on 11 November 1618 at the age of 74, and the town of Padua declared an official day of mourning in his honor. In 1676, the town of Padua erected a statue of the master in the Chiesa del Santo.

The importance of Fabris' work can hardly be overstated. Versions of his treatise were reprinted for over a hundred years, and translated into German at least four times as well as French and Latin. He is almost universally praised by later masters and fencing historians, and through the influence of his students and their students (most notably Hans Wilhelm Schöffer), he became the dominant figure in German fencing throughout the 17th century and into the 18th.

Treatise

Additional Resources

References

  1. Didier, Henry de Sainct. Les secrets du premier livre sur l'espée seule. Paris, 1573. pp 5-8.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Fabris, Salvator and Leoni, Tom. Art of Dueling: Salvator Fabris' Rapier Fencing Treatise of 1606. Highland Village, TX: Chivalry Bookshelf, 2005. pp XVIII-XIX.
  3. Fabris, Salvator and Leoni, Tom. Art of Dueling: Salvator Fabris' Rapier Fencing Treatise of 1606. Highland Village, TX: Chivalry Bookshelf, 2005. p XXIX.
  4. Andersson, Henrik. Salvator Fabris as a Hired Assassin in Sweden. Association for Renaissance Martial Arts. Retrieved 2011-12-18.
  5. Barbasetti, Luigi. Fencing Through the Ages.[Full citation needed]
  6. Originally "asseruatore", but corrected in the errata.
  7. Originally "richeide", but corrected in the errata.
  8. Originally "dirarsi", but corrected in the errata.
  9. Originally "longuezza", but corrected in the errata.
  10. Originally "mettre", but corrected in the errata.
  11. Originally "volto", but corrected in the errata.
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 There's no conclusion of this word on the next page, just a new sentence.
  13. Originally "occcsione", but corrected in the errata.
  14. Originally "albassare", but corrected in the errata.
  15. Originally "& migliore", but corrected in the errata.
  16. Originally "temerariemente", but corrected in the errata.
  17. Originally "bisogna", but corrected in the errata.
  18. The letter 'F' was omitted in the print and hand-corrected in all copies.
  19. Originally "guardia", but corrected in the errata.
  20. Originally "equali", but corrected in the errata.
  21. Originally "poco", but corrected in the errata.
  22. Originally "poco", but corrected in the errata.
  23. Originally "non buoni", but corrected in the errata.
  24. Originally "queui", but corrected in the errata.
  25. Originally "che spada", but corrected in the errata.
  26. Originally "accorgendosi", but corrected in the errata.
  27. Originally "con pugnale", but corrected in the errata.
  28. Originally "mouendolo", but corrected in the errata.
  29. Originally "diuersi", but corrected in the errata.
  30. Originally "dentro la spada", but corrected in the errata.
  31. Originally "andere", but corrected in the errata.
  32. Originally "richede", but corrected in the errata.
  33. Originally "in suoi", but corrected in the errata.
  34. Originally "della", but corrected in the errata.
  35. Originally "la dette", but corrected in the errata.
  36. Originally "è passare", but corrected in the errata.
  37. The errata adds "l’".
  38. Originally "farmarsi", but corrected in the errata. The errata says it should be on page 232, but this is the only instance of the word in the book.
  39. Originally "sforza", but corrected in the errata. The errata says it should be on page 241, but this is the only instance of the word on the correct line.
  40. Should be 183.
  41. Originally "ineguale", but corrected in the errata.